The research of rBCG inhibiting function on EB virus positive tumors / 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志

Objective@#The inhibition function on EB virus positive tumors with rBCG (recombinant BCG) was researched.@*Methods@#After cancer models of EB virus positive tumor cells(GT39)were established in C57BL/6 mice, the mice survival conditions, tumor weight and tumor formation time were analyzed, flow cytometry was used to research the proliferation of CD4+ T. Inhibition of rBCG to cancer was researched, HE staining of the mice tumor tissue was used to detect and analyze lymphocyte infiltration. Single factor analysis method of variance (One-way ANOVA) was processed for rBCG′s inhibition evaluation by SPSS 11.0 statistical software.@*Results@#Compared with the control group, rBCG group significantly slowed tumor growth, tumor formation time was delayed, rBCG significantly prolonged survival time of the mice.@*Conclusions@#rBCG had inhibition to EB virus positive tumors in mice.

Centerline analysis for the measurement of aortic diameter at proximal landing zone in type B aortic dissection:a preliminary study / 介入放射学杂志

Objective To investigate the feasibility of centerline measurement method in estimating aortic diameter at the proximal landing zone in Stanford B type aortic dissection. Methods CT angiography materials of 30 patients with type B aortic dissection were randomly selected from the hospital database (24 males with a median age of 49.5 years), which were retrospectively analyzed with multiplanar reformation (MPR) and centerline technique by two experts in vascular radiology. Difference between two measurement techniques was analyzed by using mixed linear model, and the agreement of measurements between two readers as well as between two techniques were evaluated by Bland-Altman plots. Results The diameters measured with MPR method by two experts were (29.73±2.99) mm and (29.86±2.95) mm respectively, while the diameters measured with centerline measurement method by two experts were (29.66 ±2.81) mm and (29.71 ±2.91) mm respectively. No statistically significant differences in the diameter value existed between the two measurement methods, although the results determined by centerline measurement method were more stable. Conclusion In determining aortic diameter at the proximal landing zone in Stanford B type aortic dissection, the centerline analysis provides a checking method for MPR measurement.